Go Back

Updated on

REITs vs. Traditional Real Estate Investment

Written by: 

Investing in real estate is a time-honored strategy for wealth accumulation and income generation. However, the advent of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) has introduced a modern twist to this traditional investment avenue. This article explores the nuances of investing in REITs versus traditional real estate, diving into their pros and cons, investment mechanics, and suitability based on investor profiles.

What are REITs?

REITs are corporations that own, operate, or finance income-generating real estate across various sectors. They function like mutual funds in the real estate sector, offering investors a share in a portfolio of properties. They come in three primary types: equity REITs, mortgage REITs, and hybrid REITs​​.

Pros of REITs

  • Liquidity: REITs are traded on major stock exchanges, allowing investors to buy and sell shares with ease, unlike physical real estate​​.
  • Dividend Income: By law, REITs must distribute at least 90% of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in attractive dividend yields​​.
  • Diversification: They provide exposure to various real estate sectors without the need to own the property directly​​.

Cons of REITs

  • Market Volatility: Being traded like stocks, REITs are subject to the fluctuations of the stock market​​.
  • Limited Control: Investors in REITs don’t have control over property management decisions​​.
  • Tax Implications: The dividends might not have favorable tax treatment compared to other investment incomes​​.

Traditional Real Estate Investment

Traditional real estate investment involves purchasing tangible property. This can range from residential homes to commercial spaces.

Pros of Traditional Real Estate:

  • Control: Investors have complete control over their investment, from tenant selection to property upgrades​​.
  • Appreciation Potential: Properties often appreciate over time, providing potential capital gains​​.
  • Tax Benefits: Direct real estate investment offers various tax advantages, such as depreciation deductions​​.

Cons of Traditional Real Estate:

  • Illiquidity: Selling physical property can take considerable time​​.
  • Management Intensity: Active involvement in property management is required unless a property manager is hired​​.
  • Higher Capital Requirement: Significant upfront investment is needed, including down payments and maintenance costs​​.

Comparative Analysis

  • Investment Threshold and Returns: REITs require a lower initial investment compared to direct real estate. The potential returns in REITs come from dividends and share value appreciation, while in real estate, it's through rental income and property value appreciation. However, these returns vary widely based on market conditions and property management​​​​.
  • Risk and Time Commitment: Both investment types carry risks, but they differ in nature. Real estate values can fluctuate, and properties can remain vacant, whereas REITs are subject to market risks and economic conditions. As for time commitment, REITs are more hands-off, while direct real estate requires active management​​​​.
  • Tax Implications: Direct real estate investments often come with more tax breaks than REITs. While REITs offer a simpler investment model, they may not be as tax-efficient, particularly concerning dividend income​​​​.
  • Liquidity and Costs: Publicly traded REITs offer more liquidity compared to real estate. The cost of investing in real estate is generally higher, considering factors like repair, insurance, and property taxes. REITs, especially publicly traded ones, might have lower associated costs​​​​.

Suitability Based on Investor Profiles

REITs are suitable for:

  • Investors seeking liquidity and ease of entry and exit.
  • Those looking for diversification in their investment portfolio.
  • Investors who prefer a hands-off approach and are content with limited control.

Traditional Real Estate is suitable for:

  • Investors who prefer direct control over their investments.
  • Those with a higher capital outlay and a willingness to manage properties.
  • Investors seeking long-term appreciation and significant tax advantages.


Deciding whether REITs or traditional real estate is the "better" investment is not a straightforward answer. It largely depends on an investor’s financial capacity, risk appetite, time horizon, and management preference. While REITs offer an easy, liquid entry into real estate investment with potential for regular income through dividends, they come with market risks and limited control. On the other hand, traditional real estate offers greater control, potential for appreciation, and substantial tax advantages, albeit with higher capital requirements and management intensity.

REITs are a good fit for investors seeking liquidity, ease of entry and exit, diversification in their investment portfolio, and a hands-off approach with limited control. Traditional real estate, conversely, suits investors who prefer direct control over their investments, have a higher capital outlay, and are willing to engage actively in property management.

These investments cater to different financial goals and lifestyles. An investor's decision should align with their long-term financial objectives, investment strategy, and the level of involvement they wish to have in their investment. It's essential to conduct thorough research or consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

For more detailed information and investment opportunities, you can visit Landa, an app providing accessible real estate investment opportunities.

Ready to start investing?

Sign up for Landa and start investing in real estate.

Get Started